After a 20 minute search, I found the skit that Saturday Night Live did about the bailout. Not only is it creatively hilarious it remarkably has a lot of truth. Through out the cries of foul play and greed concerning the sub prime mortgage I kept recalling that several years ago that politicians were pushing for more Americans to be home owners and urging lenders through rhetoric to make it happen. SNL points out that the borrowers were not the wisest nor were the politicians a few years back when this started. The skit also places some blame on the Democrats for the sub prime mortgage market collapse and not fully on those "greedy," mega lending companies. Placing any significant blame on democrats is not something that SNL does regularly. Truth can be damaging, thus the skit was pulled from the NBC, Youtube and other sites by the unknown higher powers. Michelle Malkin had a few theories about the skit's disappearance which you can read about. http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/06/the-missing-snl-bailout-skit-and-the-soros-connection/
Enjoy the skit that is on the top of the side bar then let your friends do the same.
Now stop reading if you don't want to be annoyed my rantings about all this.
So, the bailout of irresponsible people happened and the rest of us get to pick up the bill using borrowed money to pay for it. I wish the people and business involved were allowed to fall on there faces. That is how we all learn. Children whose parents who are always cleaning up after their mistakes do not learn to be responsible adults. We have too many irresponsible baby-adults in our country that do not want to face the consequences of the actions and too many coddling politicians that want to make everything fair. 700 billion dollars turns out to be $6,300 per American household. Does that seem fair to the common citizen? That figure includes households not paying taxes so it is actually higher. Hearing it like that kind of makes that large figure more real. I wondered if the money will come from China? Do they own us yet?
But do not fear Barak Hussein Obama will bring
change to America and make life more fair for all Americans. Under his care the state will continue the the Bush Administration's fight for more control over American industries as well as more control of the economy. Who needs capitalism? Its not fair to the workers. Workers unite for the good of the Motherland! Obama will redistribute money from the greedy rich people to you. After all it is yours in somewhat anyway. It'd be for the common good. It is not fair that others should have more. The state will take care of you.
Aack! Where's a Ronald Reagan when you need one? I want someone to have the courage that he had to give his Berlin speech saying, "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall." I still gets chills remembering about that moment. That was so not PC at the time. How about, "Sheiks of Saudi Arabia, keep your oil. We are drilling for our own. Sorry environmentalists and Chevron."
Don't both parties agendas sound socialistic and communistic? Socialism and communism were used interchangeably before Lenin came around with his revolution. Sigh. I'll keep praying nightly for some real conservative, constitutionlist, capitalism loving leaders that don't have their head in the clouds about making life fair and that love their country more than their agendas and pride. Palin is the only one that inspires me at all.
In case your definitions of socialism and communism are fuzzy from the years since college, here are a few dictionary definitions to refresh your memory.
American Heritage Dictionary -
com·mu·nism (kŏm'yə-nĭz'əm)
n.
A theoretical economic system characterized by the collective ownership of property and by the organization of labor for the common advantage of all members.
Communism
A system of government in which the state plans and controls the economy and a single, often authoritarian party holds power, claiming to make progress toward a higher social order in which all goods are equally shared by the people.
The Marxist-Leninist version of Communist doctrine that advocates the overthrow of capitalism by the revolution of the proletariat.
Com"mu*nism\, n. [F. communisme, fr. commun common.] A scheme of equalizing the social conditions of life; specifically, a scheme which contemplates the abolition of inequalities in the possession of property, as by distributing all wealth equally to all, or by holding all wealth in common for the equal use and advantage of all.
Note: At different times, and in different countries, various schemes pertaining to socialism in government and the conditions of domestic life, as well as in the distribution of wealth, have been called communism.
Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, © 1996, 1998 MICRA, Inc.socialism
An economic system in which the production and distribution of goods are controlled substantially by the government rather than by private enterprise, and in which cooperation rather than competition guides economic activity. There are many varieties of socialism. Some socialists tolerate capitalism, as long as the government maintains the dominant influence over the economy; others insist on an abolition of private enterprise. All communists are socialists, but not all socialists are communists.
The American Heritage® New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition
Copyright © 2005 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
American Heritage Dictionary -
so·cial·ism (sō'shə-lĭz'əm) Pronunciation Key
n.
Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.
The stage in Marxist-Leninist theory intermediate between capitalism and communism, in which collective ownership of the economy under the dictatorship of the proletariat has not yet been successfully achieved.